Post by BKBKAdam, mine is not to second-guess, just to suggest an answer to the question
asked.
Sure. As was I: the file *will* get scanned if you set the passive scanner
to do so. So it's answering the question. I also think it's a better
solution than using <cfexecute> to call the CLI scanner. By that's just an
opinion thing.
As for the heuristics of the passive scanner... it all depends on the
settings.
My experience of these forums, is that often the questions can be taken two
ways:
1) absolutely literally;
2) giving some thought to what's being asked and - yes - second guess WHY
the question might be being asked, and what end result the person asking
the question wants to arrive at.
There are a lot of beginners on these forums, and quite often it's not
occurred to the person asking the question that there's more than one way
to skin a cat, nor that they might not be asking quite the right question
(I'm not saying either applies to this particular situation: I'm speaking
generally).
In the reverse situation, if *I* was perhaps approaching things "not the
best way", I'd sure like to find out.
That's why I don't necessarily answer a question as literally as its being
asked.
Make sense?
--
Adam